Technology Bloggers

Championing responsible innovation in partnership with the Bassetti Foundation

  • Home
  • About
  • Contact

Technology Bloggers

  • Home
  • About
  • Contact

Championing responsible innovation in partnership with the Bassetti Foundation

bank account - Tag Archive

PayPal – is the internet giant a force for good?

12th March 2013 18 Replies Christopher Roberts

PayPal, its an internet giant – you can’t really argue with that. 110 million active users worldwide and counting.

Facebook, Twitter, Amazon, Google+, PayPal, Instagram and eBay ranked by active number of users

The number of active users top internet sites have – PayPal ranks among them with 110 million.

PayPal claims that 59% of purchases are completed using its service, however on average in the US, 88% of users abandon their virtual cart before the checkout.

The debate is still open as to whether people user PayPal because it offers the best service, or because it has a market monopoly – so like with Windows and Facebook, it is hard for people to choose another company, as everyone seems to be using it.

One cannot argue that PayPal offers a useful service. Users can exchange funds, send gifts and purchase goods from an account which gives additional security and guarantees, and doesn’t hold the key to an individuals personal life savings – as a bank account does. PayPal will also convert [many] foreign currencies into your local one, taking a small commission.

PayPal is easy to use, just get someone’s email address, and you can send money to them, or request funds from them. PayPal is also integrated with eBay (well, eBay owns PayPal) and many other sites, making buying online very easy. That said, Amazon still refuse to support it – maybe because eBay is one of its major competitors? Who knows.

Charges

One of the [major] downsides of PayPal are the charges. If one individual transfers money to another individual via a bank transfer, then there are usually no charges. PayPal however does charge.

PayPal's logoIf you use sterling, 3.4% of your transaction and an additional 20 pence will go to the folks at PayPal. So if you get a payment of £150, after fees you will have £144.70; so you lose £5.30. If you trade in US dollars, then the fee is 2.9% and $0.30 – slightly more reasonable. All the Scandinavian countries are charged 3.9% in addition to a fixed fee, as is Japan.

If every month you have a large inflow of money into your PayPal account, your fees do get reduced, and in the UK your fees can drop as low as 1.4% if you receive over £55,000 a month.

You could argue that these charges are fair, as PayPal is a business and needs to make a profit. However you could also argue that users are a little overcharged for the service PayPal provide.

PayPal Here

You can do almost anything on your mobile these days. In terms of business, there are mobile payroll apps, contact managers, and even mobile trading apps, so is it any surprise that PayPal has a mobile application? Probably not. It has several in fact, one for Android, one for iPhone and another for Windows mobiles. As the firm boasts:

“You don’t have to be at a computer to use PayPal – you can shop or send money securely wherever you are.”

But the PayPal app is no longer the only connection between your smartphone and the internet giant.

Last month, PayPal announced that it had developed and was launching a chip and PIN device, called PayPal Here, which (as they put it) provides “a simple, secure way, to accept payments on your mobile device“.

The PayPal Here device wirelessly connects to the sellers smartphone, which hosts a PayPal app, and gives the user the security of a wired chip and PIN, via the phone. So, the seller inputs the amount they want to charge, links their phone to the device, gives it to the customer, who inserts their card, enters their PIN, and the sale is complete.

This could potentially allow anyone to take a payment from virtually everywhere. Industries which were previously solely reliant on cash like taxi services and market stalls, can now potentially take payments by card.

Debit Card

Late last year, PayPal launched its own debit card, so users can directly access their funds via a card. Users can also earn 1% cash back when enrolled in PayPal’s Preferred Rewards Program.

These recent changes are leading me to wonder whether PayPal might choose to move into the banking industry soon? A debit card and an easy access ‘current’ account are both features of most high street banks.

Do you think PayPal will (in the near future) be launching a savings account? Could it start to offer users an overdraft facility, or even short-term loans? I believe it is a possibility – and not an unlikely one either.

Is the demise of big banks on the horizon?

20th July 2012 6 Replies Christopher Roberts

There are many ways you can grow your money.

You could invest in a project, such as installing solar panels, this can be really beneficial and can pay you back many times over the life of the panels, it is also green. Solar is a long-term investment though, so if you want quick returns, it might not be your thing.

You could buy property, become a landlord and earn income via letting it out to tenants.

You could gamble with it, which can have really high returns, however this is rare, whereas big losses arn’t.

You could invest your money in stocks and shares, and hope that the stockmarket value of them increases. This is a risky but potentially very lucrative way to earn money.

Alternatively you could put your money in a bank – or a building society or cooperative. This is probably the safest option.

Big Banks

In the UK, during the 1980’s many building societies changed into banks meaning they were allowed to float on the stockmarket, due to a change in British banking laws.

During this time, many of the banks we know today either turned from building societies into banks or took over smaller building societies. This created the ‘big banks‘ that we know today.

Bank on Dave

A recent television show I watched (called Bank of Dave) made me think about banking a lot more. In 2008 bankers were put in front of a committee of MPs and grilled, as a result of the global banking crisis.

Despite the massive losses many banks have encored, most have still awarded tens of thousand, hundreds of thousand and even million pound bonuses to their top employees.

In Bank of Dave, millionaire David Fishwick, used tens of thousands of pounds of his own money to set up a small cooperative cross building society, which he liked to call a ‘tiny bank’. The reason he did this is because he was sick of banks not lending, acting improperly/indecently/immorally and treating savers badly.

Dave owns a business dealing in minibuses, minicoaches and vans, and noticed that in 2008 when the banking crisis hit, many of his customers could no longer get loans to buy his products. This angered him and was another reason why he started his bank.

Bank of Dave - David Fishwick

David Fishwick – the Yorkshireman who was fed up of the big banks, so set up his own.

In just six months Dave made almost £95,011 profit by simply taking peoples (and before he got all the necessary licences his own) savings (he couldn’t legally say ‘deposits’) and lending them out to local businesses and individuals who were unable to get loans from the banks. The profits (after paying the two employees and presumably himself) went to local charities.

Due to its low overheads and risk, the bank could offer savers an amazing 5% interest rate.

Dave persuaded his local MP to lobby for him and his venture in parliament. Dave also managed to get the Business Secretary Vince Cable and politician Alastair Campbell to appear on the show, both of whom agreed that it was the sort of business/banking that the country needed, opposed to the monopolistic big banks that we have today. Vince Cable told Dave that he would speak to the FSA to try to make it easier for Dave to operate, and more people to start up similar ventures in future.

Most of the businesses the Bank of Dave (officially Burnley Savings and Loans Ltd. for legal reasons) helped, were legitimate and honest local ventures, which grew and thrived when they received the cash they vitally needed either to stay afloat or expand. An amazing 98% of the businesses Bank of Dave lent to were paying back their loans on time at the end of the programme!

The show was a real eye opener to me, as to the way things are currently run and how they could potentially be run.

In the global economic downturn, the UK lenders that have weather the storm well are Nationwide Building Society and the Co-operative. These are not your typical big bank, they are more community focused, ‘friendly’ institutions. Why? Because they don’t pay crazy bonuses, don’t engage in unethical business and are more careful with what they do with savers money – i.e. don’t take high risk gambles.

The show Bank of Dave ended with the commentator saying:

“Could this be the start of a banking revolution?”

I think it could be.

Just yesterday, the ‘safer’ more responsible Co-operative bank made a deal to take a form of ownership of the not so stable Lloyds Banking Group. A big bank that has been cut down to size?

Bye Bye Big Banks?

Considerable awareness has now been raised about the way our banks operate, and whether there is a viable, better alternative.

My thoughts are that if institutions like the Co-operative, Nationwide Building Society and Burnley Savings and Loans Ltd. are doing so well, then they could well be the future. They seem to have greater public support, lend to more people, offer better interest rates, and are less risky.

I think a banking revolution is on the horizon – you heard it here first!

Is One-Factor Authentication Really Sufficient?

20th August 2011 6 Replies Alan

In the analogue world, we identify ourselves by our national identity card which consists of basic information such as name, address, date of birth, and a unique ID number.

However this cannot be done in the digital world. Whenever you go online, even your name is not commonly used for identification. What commonly used is the username and password and these two are the basic criteria of a one-factor authentication.

The one-factor authentication is also known as ‘something you know’. Today we have more than one factor when it comes to authentication and it is applied by using a software or hardware device as part of your authentication. This make up the second factor and it is known as ‘something you have’. There is also third factor which is still not popularly used is the third factor or also known as ‘something you are’.
A set of keysThe reason of having so many factors in authentication is that the one-factor authentication is not sufficient for a sensitive transaction’s security. It is vulnerable to the traditional ‘Brute-Force’ attack that it is still useful today simply because computers today are extremely fast and it can even be done not only using CPU but also GPU.

The other weakness of one-factor authentication is that it is extremely vulnerable to ‘Password Reuse’ attack. There are not many users who change their password frequently or use different password for different online account. As a result, any username and passwords that are hacked can be possibly used from time to time on different website.

So now, do you perform your online banking transaction with just username and password? Think twice before you put your online banking account at risk.

Even for certain two factor devices, they are vulnerable to phishing attack. With the increasing cybercrime rate, we should focus more in our IT security. Especially for online banking account users, do think of your safety if you are still with one-factor authentication on that.

  • 1
  • 2

Blog Topics

  • AI
    (7)
  • Business
    (88)
  • Electric Vehicles
    (12)
  • Gadgets
    (177)
    • Apps
      (48)
    • Computers
      (77)
  • Internet
    (192)
    • Blogging
      (49)
    • Search Engines
      (21)
    • Social Media
      (31)
  • Science
    (154)
    • Environment
      (64)
    • Space
      (13)
  • Technology
    (245)

Go Back In Time (Archives)

Technology Bloggers is working in partnership with the Bassetti Foundation to promote responsible inovation – learn more.

  • X
  • LinkedIn